Payments in Lieu of Taxes: Feds Only Pay Counties 55% of what they owe.
The below is intended to be an informational opinion, not a proofed article. Please contact the author with questions and opinions. I would appreciate a Cc.
Thanks, Jay
Payments in Lieu of Taxes::Feds
Only Pay Counties 55% of what they owe.
An
action brief by Col. Randy Givens U. S. Army
(retired) rg2162@ev1.net
The U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Division of Realty website at: http://realty.fws.gov/nwrf2.html shows that
their budget request for PILT (Payments in
Lieu of Taxes" http://www.blm.gov/pilt/ or
federal payments to local governments that help offset losses in property taxes due to
nontaxable Federal lands within their boundaries) is only 55% of what
they owe the counties.
USFWS likes to whine that it is Congress, which shortchanges the Counties .... However,
Congress only goes along with what the USFWS says it wants to pay... which is about half
what it owes the counties. See the third from the last sentence at http://realty.fws.gov/nwrf2.html, which starts
with "The National Wildlife Refuge Fund 2003 budget request..."
To understand how/why they do this, think of the entire federal budget for a year as a
pie. USFWS knows that it will only get so big of a slice of the pie. They know what they
want to do with the money they get... buy more land. This is in spite of the fact that
they owe the counties a bunch of money. Therefore, to try to hide the truth, they ask
Congress for only half of what they owe us, and then blame Congress for not funding PILT
at 100%.
Each year, the USFWS sends its Refuge Managers to the
One technique we can use against them is to anticipate their dog and pony show, and expose
it for what it is. Just before show time, we
need to get the
This can help by
1. Getting the Counties the money, they need to help offset the USFWS theft
of their land/tax base.
2. Denying USFWS that money to grab
more land.
Included in all this should be an educational item that the USFWS destroys tax base by
buying Conservation Easements, which reduces the value of the land (no development
potential), and therefore permanently holds down the value of the land for taxes, thereby
permanently reducing the tax base of the County.